Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 26 No. 114 (2022)
Communication, Negationism, Ideology and Science

Monographic

Covid-19 in Brazil: Political controversies over social isolation measures to control the pandemic. A science vs. antiscience dispute?

https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v26i114.1948

Published 2022-10-26

  • Monique Batista de Oliveira
    • ,
  • Miguel Said Vieira
    • ,
  • Marko Synesio Alves Monteiro
    • ,
  • Marco Akerman

Monique Batista de Oliveira
Universidade de São Paulo

Miguel Said Vieira
Universidade Federal do ABC

Marko Synesio Alves Monteiro
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

Marco Akerman


Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has narrowed the relationship between scientists and leaders around the world, with challenging decisions shared by both areas. Social isolation measures in Brazil as a way to control Sars-CoV-2 cases were involved in an intense political debate. Our aim in this article is to establish whether this dispute can be perceived as a science vs. antiscience controversy. In order to do so, we used criteria based on the Social Studies of Science and Technology (STS), which understands science fact as co-produced by social legitimation and influential actors, and Collins & Pinch approach to define an antiscientific discourse. By searches in the press and Twitter, from the first case of Sars-CoV-2 in Brazil — 25 February 2020 — until the 26th of April, we found three important political actors in the social isolation debate: 1) João Doria, governor of São Paulo; 2) Henrique Mandetta, ministry of Health; 3) Jair Bolsonaro, president of Brazil. Although there were different approaches in relation to science, with actor (1) dialoguing with an elite scientific community, actor (2) avoiding the debate initially, and referring to a more insulated science with selective debates; and actor (3) having a science-related populism approach, the investigation concluded that social isolation measures debate in Brazil were not polarized as a science vs. antiscience debate. Science and its symbolic authority were used by all actors to legitimate their positions, and, for this reason, we believe it would be very difficult for the general public to analyze whether these actors were using good quality evidence to support their positions. Further studies can invest in the analysis of social consensus production beyond scientific claims.

Keywords: Covid-19; dissent and disputes; social isolation, quarantine, antiscience, science controversy

Keywords

Covid-19, dissent and disputes, social isolation, quarantine, antiscience, science controversy

PDF

References

  1. Agamben, G., Zizek, S., Nancy, J. L., Berardi, F. “Bifo”, Petit, S. L., Butler, J., Badiou, A., Harvey, D., Han, B.-C., Zibechi, R., Galindo, M., Gabriel, M., González, G. Y., Patricia Manrique, & Preciado, P. B. (2020). Sopa de Wuhan: Pensamiento Conteporaneo em Tiempos de Pandemias. ASPO (Aislamiento Social Preventivo y Obligatorio)
  2. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Routledge & K. Paul
  3. Boulware, D. R., Pullen, M. F., Bangdiwala, A. S., Pastick, K. A., Lofgren, S. M.,
  4. Okafor, E. C., Skipper, C. P., Nascene, A. A., Nicol, M. R., Abassi, M., Engen, N. W., Cheng, M. P., LaBar, D., Lother, S. A., MacKenzie, L. J., Drobot, G., Marten, N., Zarychanski, R., Kelly, L. E., … Hullsiek, K. H. (2020). A Randomized Trial of
  5. Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(6), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2016638
  6. Brasil, MS. (2020, fevereiro 26). Brasil confirma primeiro caso da doença. Ministério da Saúde. https://www.saude.gov.br/noticias/agencia-saude/46435-brasil-confirma-primeiro-caso-de-novo-coronavirus
  7. Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: The Case of the Scallops and Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. Em Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph 32. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  8. Cambricoli, F., & Ribeiro, B. (2020, março 17). Brasil registra primeira morte pelo novo coronavírus em SP; País tem 290 casos confirmados—Saúde. Estadão. https://saude.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,brasil-registra-primeira-morte-pelo-novo-coronavirus-em-sao-paulo,70003236434
  9. Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., & MacKenzie, M. (1990). Scientific Practice in the Courtroom: The Construction of Sociotechnical Identities in a Biotechnology Patent Dispute. Social Problems, 37(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/800743
  10. CNN Brasil. (2020, março 21). Não terá colapso na saúde, diz Bolsonaro. CNN Brasil. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/2020/03/22/nao-tera-colapso-na-saude-diz-bolsonaro
  11. Croda, J., Oliveira, W. K. de, Frutuoso, R. L., Mandetta, L. H., Baia-da-Silva, D. C., Brito-Sousa, J. D., Monteiro, W. M., & Lacerda, M. V. G. (2020). COVID-19 in Brazil: Advantages of a socialized unified health system and preparation to contain cases. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 53, e20200167. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0167-2020
  12. Cruz, E. P. (2020, abril 27). Taxa de isolamento social em SP foi 58% no domingo; governo quer 70%. Agência Brasil. https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/saude/noticia/2020-04/taxa-de-isolamento-social-em-sp-foi-58-no-domingo-governo-quer-70
  13. Dantas, D. (2020, março 21). Governo de São Paulo decreta quarentena por 15 dias em todo o estado. O Globo. https://oglobo.globo.com/sociedade/coronavirus/governo-de-sao-paulo-decreta-quarentena-por-15-dias-em-todo-estado-1-24320394
  14. Ferguson, N., Laydon, D., Nedjati Gilani, G., Imai, N., Ainslie, K., Baguelin, M., Bhatia, S., Boonyasiri, A., Cucunuba Perez, Z., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., Dighe, A.,
  15. Dorigatti, I., Fu, H., Gaythorpe, K., Green, W., Hamlet, A., Hinsley, W., Okell, L., Van Elsland, S., … Ghani, A. (2020). Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College London. https://doi.org/10.25561/77482
  16. Folha de S.Paulo. (2020, abril 8). Biólogo e youtuber Atila Iamarino estreia coluna na Folha—08/04/2020—Equilíbrio e Saúde—Folha. Folha de S.Paulo. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/equilibrioesaude/2020/04/biologo-e-youtuber-atila-iamarino-estreia-coluna-na-folha.shtml?aff_source=56d95533a8284936a374e3a6da3d7996
  17. Fujimura, J. H. (1988). The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research: Where Social Worlds Meet. Social Problems, 35(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/800622
  18. G1. (2020, março 28). 19—’Se a gente sair andando todo mundo de uma vez, vai faltar pro rico, pro pobre’, diz ministro da Saúde [Venturino]. G1. https://g1.globo.com/bemestar/coronavirus/noticia/2020/03/28/se-a-gente-sair-andando-todo-mundo-de-uma-vez-vai-faltar-pro-rico-pro-pobre-diz-ministro-da-saude.ghtml
  19. G1 SP. (2020, março 18). Governo determina fechamento de shoppings e academias na Grande SP para conter avanço do coronavírus | São Paulo | G1. G1. https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2020/03/18/governo-determina-fechamento-de-shoppings-na-regiao-metropolitana-de-sp-ate-23-de-marco.ghtml
  20. Gautret, P., Lagier, J.-C., Parola, P., Hoang, V. T., Meddeb, L., Mailhe, M., Doudier, B., Courjon, J., Giordanengo, V., Vieira, V. E., Tissot Dupont, H., Honoré, S., Colson, P., Chabrière, E., La Scola, B., Rolain, J.-M., Brouqui, P., & Raoult, D. (2020).
  21. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 56(1), 105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
  22. Hameleers, M. (2021). The Scientists Have Betrayed Us! The Effects of Anti-Science Communication on Negative Perceptions Toward the Scientific Community. International Journal of Communication. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17179
  23. Iamarino, A. (2020, março 20). Live Coronavírus de 20/03—O que o Brasil precisa fazer nos próximos dias. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF2pXXJIAGM
  24. Jasanoff, S. (Org.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge.
  25. Klintman, M. (2002). The Genetically Modified (GM) Food Labelling Controversy: Ideological and Epistemic Crossovers. Social Studies of Science, 32(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032001004
  26. Kuhn, S. T. (2007). A estrutura das revoluções científicas (9o ed). Perspectiva.
  27. Latour, B. (1994). Jamais fomos modernos: Ensaio de antropologia simétrica. 34.
  28. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. Oxford University Press.
  29. Latour, B. (2011). Ciência em ação: Como seguir cientistas e enfenheiros sociedade afora (J. de P. Assis, Trad.). Editora Unesp.
  30. Latour, B. (2020, março 30). Imaginer les gestes-barrières contre le retour à la production d’avant-crise. AOC. https://aoc.media/opinion/2020/03/29/imaginer-les-gestes-barrieres-contre-le-retour-a-la-production-davant-crise/
  31. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Sage Publications.
  32. Law, J. (2004). After Method. Mess in social science research. Routledge.
  33. Menezes, P. de L., Garner, D. M., & Valenti, V. E. (2020). BRAZIL IS PROJECTED TO BE THE NEXT GLOBAL COVID-19 PANDEMIC EPICENTER [Preprint]. Health Systems and Quality Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.28.20083675
  34. Ministério da Saúde. (2020, abril 26). Ministério da Saúde atualiza a situação do coronavírus—26.02.2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op8PL-WtQuA
  35. Mulkay, M. (1994). Changing minds about embryo research. Public Understanding of Science, 3(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/3/2/004
  36. Pinch, T. J., & Collins, H. M. (1979). Is Anti-Science not-Science? Em H. Nowotny &
  37. H. Rose (Orgs.), Counter-Movements in the Sciences (Vol. 3, p. 221–250). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9421-8_11
  38. Reardon, J. (2001). The Human Genome Diversity Project: A Case Study in Coproduction. Social Studies of Science, 31(3), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031003002
  39. Rosenberg, C. E. (1992). Explaining epidemics and other studies in the history of medicine. Cambridge University Press.
  40. Salviano, M. (2020, abril 12). 20—Fantástico | Exclusivo: “brasileiro não sabe se escuta o ministro ou o presidente”, diz Mandetta. Fantástico. https://globoplay.globo.com/v/8476660/
  41. Santiago, T. (2020, abril 28). Estado de SP registra 224 novas mortes por coronavírus em 24h e chega a mais de 2 mil vítimas no total. G1. https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2020/04/28/estado-de-sp-registra-mais-de-2-mil-mortes-provocadas-pelo-coronavirus.ghtml
  42. Santos, B. de S. (2020). A cruel pedagogia do virus. Almedina.
  43. Soares, S. B. V. (2020). Coronavírus, educação e a luta de classes no Brasil. Terra Sem Amos.
  44. TV Cultura. (2020, março 31). Em menos de 24h, Roda Viva com Atila Iamarino bate 1 milhão de visualizações no YouTube. TV Cultura. https://tvcultura.com.br/noticias/1174_em-menos-de-24h-roda-viva-com-atila-iamarino-bate-1-milhao-de-visualizacoes-no-youtube.html
  45. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509102694
  46. WHO (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—Situation Report 36. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200225-sitrep-36-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=2791b4e0_2