Los cafés científicos. Divulgación del conocimiento en entornos informales
Resumen
En esta investigación analizamos las características de los denominados «cafés científicos» a partir de una muestra seleccionada de este tipo de eventos de comunicación informal del conocimiento en España, México y Líbano. Para ello, utilizamos metododolgía de análisis cuantitivo y cualitativo a partir de los datos recopilados mediante un formulario cumplimentado por los gestores, los ponentes y los asistentes a la muestra de eventos analizados. Los resultados de la investigación permiten determinar las características genéricas de este tipo de eventos y detectar los problemas comunes a todos ellos. En nuestras conclusiones se enumeran las sugerencias de mejora pertinentes como resultado del análisis y se incide en la necesidad de promover este tipo de eventos de divulgación del conocimiento y su impacto en el discurso social.
Palabras clave
comunicación cientifica, aprendizaje informal, cultura participativa, ciudadanía crítica, cambio social
Biografía del autor/a
Francisco López-Cantos
Investigador y docente en los ámbitos de la Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Ha publicado numerosos artículos que abarcan desde los medios comunitarios y el desarrollo, hasta las tecnologías de producción audiovisual, la comunicación multimedia y la cultura del videojuego, así como la imagen y la representación del conocimiento o la comunicación pública de la ciencia.Â
Citas
Adhikariid, B., Hlaingid, P. H., Robinsonid, M. T., Ruecker, A., Hidalgo Tan, N., Jatupornpimol, N., … Cheah, P. Y. (2019). Evaluation of the Pint of Science festival in Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219983
Ahmed, S. M., DeFino, M., Connors, E., Visotcky, A., Kissack, A., & Franco, Z. (2017). Science Cafés: Transforming citizens to scientific citizens—What influences participants’ perceived change in health and scientific literacy? Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.24
Austin, John L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Bauer, M. W., & Jensen, P. (2011). The mobilization of scientists for public engagement. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510394457
Besley, J. C. (2018). The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014. Public Understanding of Science, 27(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516649803
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2016). Science Communication and Science in Society: A Conceptual Review in Ten Keywords. Technoscienza. Italian Jouranl for Science and Technology Studies, 7(2), 151–168.
Burks, R., Deards, K. D., & Defrain, E. (2017). Where Science Intersects Pop Culture: An Informal Science Education Outreach Program. Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries, (383). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00070
Cohen, J., & Macfarlane, H. (2007). Beer and Bosons at the Café Scientifique. Museums & Social Issues, 2(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.233
Dallas, D. (1999). Science in culture. Nature, 399(6732), 120. https://doi.org/10.1038/20118
Dallas, D. (2006). Café Scientifique—Déjà V. Cell, 126, 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.006
Dawson, G., Lintott, C., & Shuttleworth, S. (2015). Constructing Scientific Communities: Citizen Science in the Nineteenth and Twenty-First Centuries. Journal of Victorian Culture, 20(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2015.1022053
Dijkstra, A. M. (2017). Analysing Dutch Science Cafés to better understand the science-society relationship. Journal of Science Communication, 16(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1601_2017_A03.pdf
Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2008). The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy, 35(7), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X329086
Garrard, C. (2018). Pint of science: Bringing science to the public and highlighting African research. South African Journal of Science, 114(7–8), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/a0280
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine Publications. Retrieved from http://www.sxf.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Glaser_1967.pdf
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.
Grand, A. (2012). Reaching Out: The Café Scientifique Movement : Soapbox Science. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from http://blogs.nature.com/soapboxscience/2012/05/31/reaching-out-the-cafe-scientifique-movement
Grand, A. (2014). Café Scientifique. Science Progress, 97(3), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685014X14098305289149
Grand, A., Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K., & Winfield, A. F. T. (2016). Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514530374
Hara Id, N., Abbazio, J., & Perkins, K. (2019). An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science. PLoS ONE, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216789
Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge.
Jünger, J., & Fí¤hnrich, B. (2019). Does really no one care? Analyzing the public engagement of communication scientists on Twitter. New Media & Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819863413
Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Can we understand citizen science? Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/research/wiki/Public-Engagement
Mayhew, M. A., & Hall, M. K. (2012). Science Communication in a Café Scientifique for High School Teens. Science Communication, 34(4), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012444790
Nielsen, K. H., Balling, G., Hope, T., Nakamura, M., Nielsen, K. H., Balling, G., … Nakamura, M. (2015). Sipping Science: The Interpretative Flexibility of Science Cafés in Denmark and Japan. Technology and Society: An International Journal, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-2832109
Pestre, D. (2008). Challenges for the Democratic Management of Technoscience: Governance, Participation and the Political Today. Science as Culture, 17(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430802062869
Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory Paradoxes Facilitating Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology From the Top-Down? Technology & Society, 29, 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609336308
Qi Deng, University of Tsukuba, J., Bradley Allard, Clark County Public Library, U., Patrick Lo, University of Tsukuba, J., … Hong Kong Polytechnic University, H. K. (2019). The role of the library café as a learning space: A comparative analysis of three universities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science , 51(3), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742469
Reimer-Kirkham, S., & Jule, A. (2015). Crosstalk: Public Cafés as Places for Knowledge Translation Concerning Health Care Research. Health Communication, 30(5), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.868398
Robinson, M. T., Jatupornpimol, N., Sachaphimukh, S., Lí¶nnkvist, M., Ruecker, A., & Cheah, P. Y. (2017). The First Pint of Science Festival in Asia. Science Communication, 39(6), 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017739907
Sattler, F. (2019). Toast to knowledge and celebrate research discovery at Pint of Science Germany. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from https://franzisattler.com/2019/04/23/toast-to-knowledge-and-celebrate-research-discovery-at-pint-of-science-germany/
Schí¤fer, M. S., Metag, J., Feustle, J., & Herzog, L. (2016). Selling science 2.0: What scientific projects receive crowdfunding online? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 27(5), 0963662516668771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516668771
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the Philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stephan, K. (2018). Research cafés: How libraries can build communities through research and engagement. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 31. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.436
Wiehe, B. R., Landsberg, R. H., Wyatt, R. J., & Turner, M. S. (2009). A Burger, a Beer, and a Side of Science. International Year of Astronomy ASP Conference Series (Vol. 400). Retrieved from http://www.sciencecafes.org
Zheng, S., Tan, K., Angelo, J., & Perucho, U. (2018). Bringing Science to Bars: A Strategy for Effective Science Communication. Science Communication, 40(6), 819–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018808298
Zorn, T. E., Roper, J., Weaver, C. K., & Rigby, C. (2010). Influence in science dialogue: Individual attitude changes as a result of dialogue between laypersons and scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510386292