Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 20 Núm. 2_93 (2016)
La Investigación de la Comunicación Social en Ecuador: Trayectorias y configuraciones

Varia

Science and Technology Parks (Stps): Evidence in America, Asia and Europe | Ciencia y parques tecnológicos. Evidencia en América, Asia y Europa

Publicado 05/02/2016

Amanda Luiza Soares-Silva
Federal University of Sergipe

í‚ngela das-Chagas-Teles
Federal University of Sergipe

Iracema Machado-de-Aragão-Gomes
Federal University of Sergipe

Suzana Leitão-Russo
Federal University of Sergipe

Resumen

Science and Technology Parks (STPs) and Technology Business Incubators (BIs) are innovation spaces used by the governments of several countries such as science and technology development policy, through national associations or ministerial programs. The overall objective of the study is to map the National Associations and Ministry Programs of Science and Technology Parks of America, Asia and Europe. The main results: year of foundation of associations from 1984 to 2005; 1,205 members; 515 STPs; 2,210 BIs; 89,577 incubated companies; and 560,599 jobs created. The areas of activity considered most important, energy and environment, information, computing and telecommunications, manufacturing and automation technologies and service for business and industry.

Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos (PCT) y Tecnología Incubadoras de Empresas (TIE) son espacios de innovación utilizados por los gobiernos de varios países, como la política de desarrollo de ciencia y tecnología, a través de asociaciones nacionales o programas ministeriales. El objetivo general del estudio es el mapeo de las Asociaciones Nacionales y programas del Ministerio de Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos de América, Asia y Europa. Los resultados principales: El año de la fundación de asociaciones de 1984 a 2005; 1.205 miembros; 515 PCT; 2.210 (TIE); 89,577 empresas incubadas; y 560,599 puestos de trabajo creados. Las áreas de actividad considerados más importante, la energía y el medio ambiente, la información, la informática y las telecomunicaciones, tecnologías de fabricación y automatización y servicio para los negocios y la industria.

Palabras clave

Parques Científicos y Tecnológicos (PCT), Tecnología Incubadoras de Empresas (TIE), Innovación

PDF

Biografía del autor/a

Amanda Luiza Soares-Silva

Amanda Luiza Soares Silva (Brazil). Master Student, Student of Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science - Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil.

í‚ngela das-Chagas-Teles

Teles (Brazil). Master Student, Student of Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science - Federal University of Sergipe, Brazi.

Iracema Machado-de-Aragão-Gomes

Iracema Machado de Aragão Gomes (Brazil). Economist, Professor of Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science - Federal University of Sergipe, Brazi.

Suzana Leitão-Russo

Suzana Leitão Russo (Brazil). Industry Engineering, Professor of Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science - Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil and University of South Florida, U.S.A.

Citas

  1. ADT – German Association of Innovation, Technology and Business Incubation Centres (2015). http://www.adt-online.de/ [Accessed May 17, 2015].
  2. ANPROTEC – Associação Nacional de Entidades Promotoras de Empreendimentos Inovadores (2015). http://anprotec.org.br/ [Accessed May 21, 2015].
  3. ASPTE – Spanish Association of Science and Technology Parks (2015). http://www.apte.org/ [Accessed May 25, 2015].
  4. Bellgardt, F., Gohlke, J., Haase, H., Parzonka, R., & Schicketanz, J. (2014). Triple helix and residential development in a science and technology park: the role of intermediaries. Triple Helix, 1, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1186/s40604-014-0010-1.
  5. Chesbrough, H. (2012). Inovação Aberta: Como criar e lucrar com tecnologia. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  6. Cho, M.-H. (2014). Technological catch-up and the role of universities: South Korea’s innovation-based growth explained through the Corporate Helix. Triple Helix, 1, pp. 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s40604-014-0002-1.
  7. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123.
  8. Helmers, C., & Rogers, M. (2013). The impact of university research on corporate patenting: evidence from UK universities. Journal Transfer of Technology, 40, pp. 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10961-013-9320-0.
  9. IASP – International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation (2015). http://www.iasp.ws/ [Accessed June, 2015].
  10. ISBA – Indian Science and Technology Entrepreneurs Park & Business Incubators Association; NSTEDB – National Science & Technology Entrepreneurship Development Board (2014). Fuelling Entrepreneurship: The Story of Technology Busines Incubation in India. – India, 2014. http://www.nstedb.com/booklet.pdf [Accessed Jun 18, 2015].
  11. MCTI – Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação; Unb – Universidade de Brasília (2014). Estudo de Projetos de Alta Complexidade: indicadores de parques tecnológicos. – Brasilia: CDT/UnB, 2014. http://www.anprotec.org.br/Relata/PNI_FINAL_web.pdf [Accessed Jun 18, 2015].
  12. Mêgnigbêto, E. (2014). Information flow within the West African. Triple Helix, 1, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1186/s40604-014-0005-y.
  13. MOITAL – Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor (The Office of the Chief Scientist – OCS, The Technologycal Incubators Program) (2015). http://www.incubators.org.il/ [Accessed May 17, 2015].
  14. MOST – Ministry of Science and Technology (“Torch” High Technology Industry Development Center) (2015). http://www.chinatorch.gov.cn/> [Accessed June 21, 2015].
  15. NBIA – National Business Incubation Association (2015). http://www.nbia.org [Accessed June 21, 2015].
  16. Nepelski, D., & De Pratto, G. (2015). International technology sourcing between a developing country and the rest of the world. A case study of China. Technovation, 35, pp. 12-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.007.
  17. RETIS – France Technopoles Entreprises Innovation. http://www.retis-innovation.fr/ [Accessed June 22, 2015.
  18. Rubin, T. H., Aas, T. H., & Stead, A. (2015). Knowledge flow in Technological Business Incubators: Evidence from Australia and Israel. Technovation, 41-42, pp. 11-24. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.002.
  19. RUITC – Russian Union of Innovation and Technology Centres (2015). http://ruitc.ru/ [Accessed June 18, 2015].
  20. Sábato, B. (1968). La ciência y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración., 3, pp. 15-36.
  21. Sanz, L. (2011). Science/ Technology Park. http://www.iasp.ws/knowledge-bites [Accessed May 16, 2015].
  22. Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, Nova Cultura.
  23. Spice Group – Science Park & Innovation Center Association's Directory (2015). http://www.spica-directory.net/ [Accessed June, 2015].
  24. SISP – Swedish Incubators & Science Parks (2015). http://www.sisp.se/ [Accessed May 27, 2015].
  25. Stanford University (2015). https://www.stanford.edu/about/history/history_ch3.html [Accessed May 17, 2015.
  26. UKSPA – United Kingdom Science Park Association (2015). http://www.ukspa.org.uk/ [Accessed June 14, 2015.
  27. Wan, F., Williamson, P. J., & Yin, E. (2015). Antecedents and implications of disruptive innovation: Evidence from China. Technovation, 39-40, pp. 94-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.012.