Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 26 Núm. 114 (2022)
Comunicación, Negacionismo, Ideología y Ciencia

Varia

Análisis de la producción científica sobre educación stem en la Web of Science

Publicado 10/26/2022

  • Luis Gabriel Parrales Picazo
    • ,
  • Luis Eduardo Tomala Villon
    • ,
  • Luis Anibal Palate Gaibor
    • ,
  • Lenny Evelin Alejandro Vallejo

Luis Gabriel Parrales Picazo
Instituto Superior Tecnologico “Centro Tecnologico Naval”

Luis Eduardo Tomala Villon
Aselet Ingenieria-Asesoria-Consultoria-Capacitacion EHSQ

Luis Anibal Palate Gaibor
Instituto Superior Tecnologico “Centro Tecnologico Naval”

Lenny Evelin Alejandro Vallejo
Investigador Independiente

Resumen

La educación STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas) día a día es esencial por la evolución y avance tecnológico, porque su integración en el aula de clase permite preparar individuos competentes para hacer frente a los retos de la cuarta revolución industrial y las variaciones continuas del mercado laboral actual. El objetivo del manuscrito es analizar la tendencia de producción científica sobre educación STEM a nivel global en la base de datos científica de la Web of Science, mediante indicadores bibliométricos. La investigación es de tipo cualitativa, descriptiva, transversal utilizando un enfoque bibliométrico para analizar las tendencias de publicación. Los resultados presentan indicadores de impacto, producción, visibilidad y colaboración. Identificando un ritmo de producción creciente entre 2009 y 2021, siendo, Estados Unidos el país mayormente productivo, la mayoría de publicaciones se encuentran en el primer y segundo cuartil, las palabras claves prevalentes son “Educaction STEM”, “Science”, “Education”, “Students”, “Mathematic”.

Palabras clave

Tendencia, producción, científica, educación STEM, bibliométrico

PDF

Citas

  1. Amato-Henderson, S., Lehman, J. B., y Cattelino, P. (2009). Outreach to Prospective Engineering Students: Assessing Michigan Technological University’s YES! Expo. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 25(3), 444–451.
  2. Asik, G., Kucuk, Z. D., Helvaci, B., y Corlu, M. S. (2017). Integrated teaching project: A sustainable approach to teacher education. Turkish Journal Of Education, 6(4), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.332731
  3. Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., y Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review Of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
  4. Borrego, M., y Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies. Journal Of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040
  5. Cantrell, P., y Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009). Exploring STEM Career Options through Collaborative High School Seminars. Journal Of Engineering Education, 98(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01026.x
  6. Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., y Weller, J. (2011). What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering Education. Journal Of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00015.x
  7. Corlu, M. S. (2013). Insights into STEM Education Praxis: An Assessment Scheme for Course Syllabi. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 13(4), 2477–2485.
  8. Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., y Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM Education: Implications for Educating Our Teachers For the Age of Innovation. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education And Science, 39(171), 74–85.
  9. English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. International Journal Of Science And Mathematics Education, 15, S5–S24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
  10. English, L. D., Hudson, P., y Dawes, L. (2011). Perceived Gender Differences in STEM Learning in the Middle School. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 389–398.
  11. Geisinger, B. N., y Raman, D. R. (2013). Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 914–925.
  12. Hudson, P., English, L. D., y Dawes, L. (2013). Female Students’ Interactions in a Middle School Engineering Project: A Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2nd International Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Education Conference), 814–821.
  13. Kim, C. M., Kim, D., Yuan, J. M., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., y Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
  14. Margot, K. C., y Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal Of STEM Education, 6(2), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
  15. McLurkin, J., Rykowski, J., John, M., Kaseman, Q., y Lynch, A. J. (2013). Using Multi-Robot Systems for Engineering Education: Teaching and Outreach With Large Numbers of an Advanced, Low-Cost Robot. Ieee Transactions On Education, 56(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2222646
  16. Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M., y Shuman, L. J. (2014). Defining the Majors that Comprise “STEM”: An Analytical Method for Looking Beyond the Classical Acronym. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 360–377.
  17. Riechert, S. E., y Post, B. K. (2010). From Skeletons to Bridges & Other STEM Enrichment Exercises for High School Biology. American Biology Teacher, 72(1), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.1.6
  18. Rita Yurievna Stytsyuk. (2021). Impact of STEM Education on Soft Skill Development in IT Students through Educational Scrum Projects. Revista Publicando, 18(84), 10.
  19. Schelly, C., Anzalone, G., Wijnen, B., y Pearce, J. M. (2015). Open-source 3-D printing technologies for education: Bringing additive manufacturing to the classroom. Journal Of Visual Languages And Computing, 28, 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004
  20. Tomás-Górriz, V., y Tomás-Casterá, V. (2018). La Bibliometría en la evaluación de la actividad científica. Hospital a Domicilio, 2(4), 145. https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51
  21. Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., y Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal Of Technology And Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
  22. van Eck, N. J., y Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  23. Wang, X. L. (2013). Modeling Entrance into STEM Fields of Study Among Students Beginning at Community Colleges and Four-Year Institutions. Research In Higher Education, 54(6), 664–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9291-x